​Welcome to 3S International Company Limited

The news

You are here: home » The news » Company News » Manifold Material Selection: Aluminum, Brass, 304, 316, Duplex, and Titanium Compared

Manifold Material Selection: Aluminum, Brass, 304, 316, Duplex, and Titanium Compared

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2026-05-07      Origin: Site

Manifold Material Selection: Aluminum, Brass, 304, 316, Duplex, and Titanium Compared

Material selection remains the most consequential decision in manifold specification. Choose incorrectly and corrosion, fatigue, or contamination will force premature replacement. This guide compares six common manifold materials across key performance metrics.

Material Comparison Matrix:

MaterialCorrosion ResistancePressure CapabilityCostWeightBest Application
Aluminum 6061Poor (requires coating)Moderate (3,000 psi)$LightDry air, indoor, non-corrosive
Brass C36000Fair (dezincification risk)Moderate (2,500 psi)$$MediumWater, oil, mild environments
Stainless 304Good (not for chlorides)High (5,000 psi)$$HeavyGeneral industrial, food contact
Stainless 316Very Good (chloride resistant)High (5,000 psi)$$$HeavyMarine, chemical, water treatment
Duplex 2205Excellent (superior pitting resistance)Very High (6,000 psi)$$$$HeavyOffshore, desalination, aggressive chemicals
Titanium Grade 2Exceptional (immune to most corrosion)Very High (6,000 psi)$$$$$MediumPharmaceutical, high-purity, extreme chemical

Material Selection Flowchart:

text
复制
下载
Start: Identify fluid chemistry
    ↓
Is fluid water-based?
    ↓ Yes → Check chloride concentration
        ↓ <100 ppm → 304 stainless acceptable
        ↓ 100-1000 ppm → 316 stainless required
        ↓ >1000 ppm → Duplex or Titanium
    ↓ No → Is fluid oil/hydraulic?
        ↓ Yes → Aluminum acceptable (dry environment)
        ↓ No → Chemical process?
            ↓ pH 4-10 → 316 stainless
            ↓ pH <4 or >10 → Duplex or Titanium

Cost vs. Service Life Trade-off:

MaterialInitial Cost IndexExpected Service Life (corrosive environment)Value Rating
Aluminum (coated)1.0x2-4 yearsPoor
304 Stainless1.8x5-8 yearsFair
316 Stainless2.5x10-15 yearsExcellent
Duplex3.5x15-20 yearsVery Good
Titanium8.0x25+ yearsApplication specific

3S International Material Recommendation Protocol:
Our engineers request your fluid analysis data and operating conditions, then provide documented material recommendations with expected service life projections. We stock all six material types for rapid prototyping and production.

Decision Tool: Submit your fluid composition and temperature range. Receive a material recommendation within 24 hours, including corrosion rate projections and TCO analysis.


 FEEDBACK
3S International Company Limited © Copyright. All rights reserved.